11/10/2023 0 Comments Eca stack results weight loss![]() It’s the shrinking part of the white box that makes it seem like it’s not working. The drug is having the same effect and is working just as effectively as when you started. The blue box is the same size in both 2 and 3. I’ve shown this graphically below comparing a diet without any drug, a diet with the drug (blue box taking the person to 110%), later in the diet with the drug (the person is at 100%) and later in the diet without the drug (the person is screwed). They don’t stop working, the body simply adapts to the process of fat loss which ends up cancelling them out. The same will hold conceptually for any dieting drugs. Your body’s adaptation simply cancels it out. But the steroids and thyroid are still having the same effect as before. What was an addition to normal becomes a replacement. Take thyroid medication and it eventually shuts down your body’s production. They go from being an addition to your normal levels to a replacement. Take anabolic steroids and they eventually shut down your body’s production (adaptation). The same holds for other drugs, I’d mention. And you’re in a much worse spot because now you’re fighting the body’s normal adaptations to dieting.Įffectively, EC seems to stop working because it goes from being an addition to a normal metabolic rate to being a replacement. The adjustment your body made is unchanged but now you’ve taken out the EC. Now your energy expenditure is 90% of what it was. This is simply offset by the body’s adaptation.īut imagine if you stopped taking the EC. It’s still generating it’s 10% increase in energy expenditure. But it’s not because the EC stopped working. Now you are only at 100% of your predicted maintenance level and fat loss should be close to the predicted values. The diet is flying along and you’ll be ripped in no time.Īnd say that 6 weeks later (number chosen for illustration), your total energy expenditure has dropped by 10%. Fat loss actually happens more quickly than would be predicted. You get a boost of about 10% over normal metabolic rate (so your energy expenditure is actually 110% of the predicted level). Your metabolic rate is 100% of the predicted level and your hunger, appetite, etc. Let’s say that you start a diet and everything is normal whatever that means. And it’s these effects, rather than the drug losing it’s effectiveness that causes both the plateau in weight loss along with an apparent loss of effect. Finally there is Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (NEAT) with limited work showing that it decreases on a diet.Īnd the end result of this is that the person is at least driven to eat more food (which can in premise be controlled) and their total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) decreases. The thermic effect of activity (TEA) goes down due to the reduction in bodyweight along with an increase in efficiency within skeletal muscle (the body burns less calories at any given energy expenditure) this can be compensated for by increasing the volume or intensity of exercise. The thermic effect of food (TEF) goes down due to less food being eaten but there doesn’t appear to be any other major effect. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) drops due to both the loss of bodyweight and an adaptive component. ![]() There is even an increased noticing and attention to those foods that occurs.Īll aspects of energy expenditure go down as well. There is an increase in hunger and appetite along with increased enjoyment of highly rewarding foods (highly palatable, high-calorie, high-fat, high-sugar foods). We know that with dieting/fat loss, there are adaptations that occur in all aspects of the energy balance equation. And that reason is how the body adapts to dieting. Rather, the perceived loss of effect is for a different reason. Or do they?Īnd the answer, in my opinion is no. ![]() Most seem to generate about a 10% weight loss and that’s it. by increasing energy expenditure) or decreasing appetite (as most pharmaceutical drugs to date have done). This is true whether they work through metabolic effects (i.e. And this goes against what is most commonly believed about not only EC (with claims that it stops working, usually based on the fact that the side effects are no longer felt) but with almost all dieting drugs (including the big pharmaceutical ones). I also presented data showing that this is actually absolutely not the case, that EC clearly not only continues working in the long-term but, for some reason, becomes more effective over time. EC Doesn’t Stop Working, The Body Adapts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |